Federal courts confront Trump’s sweeping executive actions, blocking immigration bans and preserving constitutional checks. Judges reaffirm judicial independence, countering political attacks and reshaping limits on executive authority. The Judiciary emerges as a formidable defender of balance, sending shockwaves through the nation’s power structures during Trump’s turbulent opening months.
Congress struggles to deliver Trump’s promises as Republican factions clash and major legislation stalls. Leaders race to repeal regulations, accelerate judicial confirmations, and defend party unity against internal rebellion. Early victories prove fleeting, while historic power struggles reshape the legislative landscape and reveal deep fractures beneath the surface.
Donald Trump storms into office, unleashing a flurry of executive orders that reshape immigration, energy, and regulation. His aggressive use of presidential authority redefines the pace of governance, challenges legal boundaries, and tests America’s institutions from the first sunrise of his term. The Executive Branch enters a new, relentless era.
Tariffs have long defined the boundaries between protectionism and global trade for the United States. This report explores their evolving role, focusing on the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act and President Trump’s recently announced “Liberation Day” tariffs. With primary-source data and historical analysis, we examine how past and present tariffs have shaped economic conditions, triggered international retaliation, and tested America’s leadership in global commerce.
As the March 14 deadline approaches, House Republicans have introduced a 2025 Continuing Resolution to fund the government through September 30. With defense and veterans’ healthcare receiving increased funding, while non-defense programs face cuts, the bill sets the stage for a heated political showdown. Can bipartisan negotiations prevent a government shutdown? Read on for a full breakdown of the CR’s key provisions, economic impact, and legislative outlook.
President Donald Trump delivered a fiery congressional address, touting economic wins, border security measures, and foreign policy stances. In a sharp rebuttal, Senator Elissa Slotkin countered with a centrist appeal, challenging Trump’s claims on inflation and diplomacy. As partisan tensions flare, public reaction remains divided, with skewed poll results reflecting the nation’s ongoing polarization. With the 2025 election looming, both sides sharpen their narratives in a high-stakes political battle.
In a pivotal move, the U.S. House of Representatives has approved a budget resolution featuring $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and $2 trillion in spending reductions. This decision, passed by a slim margin, aims to extend previous tax cuts and bolster defense and border security funding.
Executive Orders are pivotal tools for U.S. Presidents, yet their scope and limitations are often misunderstood. This article delves into the origins, historical applications, and constitutional boundaries of Executive Orders, contrasting them with royal decrees in monarchies. By examining the U.S. system of checks and balances, we highlight how Executive Orders function within a constitutional democracy, ensuring no President wields unchecked power.
House Republicans propose $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, $1.5 trillion in spending reductions, and a $4 trillion debt limit increase to advance Trump’s agenda.